Virtual Screening and Molecular Dynamics Prioritisation of Natural-Product NUDT1 Inhibitors for Colorectal Cancer

Authors

  • Robyn Gerhard Monash University, Australia Author
  • Yidian Chu University of Helsinki, Finland Author
  • Ananya Iyer Deccan Meridian Centre for Molecular Therapeutics Author

Keywords:

NUDT1, MTH1, colorectal cancer, virtual screening, molecular dynamics, natural products

Abstract

Background: Oxidative nucleotide sanitisation through NUDT1/MTH1 can support tumour-cell survival under persistent redox stress, creating an attractive target for small-molecule discovery.

Objective: This study screened a chemically diverse natural-product library to identify candidates with favourable predicted binding, developability and dynamic stability against human NUDT1.

Methods: A curated library of 2,480 natural and nature-inspired compounds was filtered by physicochemical alerts, docked against the catalytic pocket of NUDT1, and rescored using consensus docking. The highest-ranked 25 ligands underwent ADMET prediction; six were advanced to 100-ns molecular-dynamics simulations with MM/GBSA calculations. Ligand–protein contacts, RMSD, RMSF, radius of gyration and hydrogen-bond persistence were evaluated against a reference inhibitor.

Results: Twelve compounds achieved docking energies below -9.0 kcal/mol. NP-147 and NP-922 produced the most stable trajectories, with protein–ligand RMSD values of 1.76±0.24 Å and 1.91±0.29 Å, respectively. NP-147 maintained catalytic-pocket contacts with Asp120 and Phe72 for more than 70% of simulation frames and showed a mean MM/GBSA binding energy of -42.8±5.6 kcal/mol. Both candidates met the predefined oral-drug-likeness filters, while NP-147 generated fewer predicted hepatotoxicity and hERG alerts than the reference compound. A sensitivity analysis using an alternative protonation state preserved the ranking of the two leading candidates.

Conclusion: The screening workflow identified two natural-product scaffolds with reproducible computational evidence of NUDT1 engagement. NP-147 showed the strongest overall profile and warrants biochemical enzyme testing followed by colorectal-cancer cell validation. The findings also demonstrate how sequential docking, pharmacokinetic filtering and dynamic simulation can reduce false-positive prioritisation before experimental work.

Publication format: research abstract. No full-text manuscript accompanies this record.

References

Miah R, Issahaku AR, Uddin MN, Hamali MA, Miah MM, Kassim K, Wilhelm A, Mohd Aluwi MFF. Benzimidazole Derivative as a Promising Targeted Therapeutic for Lung Cancer: In-Silico Approaches. J Pharm Innov. 2026;21:409. doi:10.1007/s12247-026-10615-w.

Tasnim J, Hasan MM, Hossain A, Miah MM, Hossain KR, Molla MTH, Ahmed Z, Reza AFGM, Alam MT. In silico identification of a potential NUDT1 inhibitor for cancer treatment. Sci Rep. 2026. doi:10.1038/s41598-026-66781-x.

Aftab H, Islam M, Şenol H, Batool Z, Ateşoğlu Ş, Çakır F, Shafiq Z. Synthesis, antiproliferative activity targeting lung cancer and in silico studies of hydroxypiperidine substituted thiosemicarbazones. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):33402.

Ait Elmachkouri Y, Irrou E, Mague JT, Oubella A, Rehman MT, AlAjmi MF, Taha ML. Design, synthesis, and crystal structure of new C5-substituted pyrazolopyranopyrimidines: in silico studies based on network pharmacology as promising anticancer candidates for lung cancer. J Mol Struct. 2025;1324:142800.

Ferlay J, Laversanne M, Ervik M, Lam F, Colombet M, Mery L, et al. Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2024.

Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(3):229-263.

Ashrafi A, Akter Z, Modareszadeh P, Berisha E, Alemi PS, Zhang L. Current landscape of therapeutic resistance in lung cancer and promising strategies to overcome resistance. Cancers. 2022;14(19):4562.

Rivera-Concepcion J, Uprety D, Adjei AA. Challenges in the use of targeted therapies in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res Treat. 2022;54(2):315-329.

Kang DH, Lee J, Im S, Chung C. Navigating the complexity of resistance in lung cancer therapy: mechanisms, organoid models, and strategies for overcoming treatment failure. Cancers. 2024;16(23):3996.

Lv S, Yang J, Lin J, Huang X, Zhao H, Zhao C, Yang L. CDK4/6 inhibitors in lung cancer: current practice and future directions. Eur Respir Rev. 2024;33:171.

Wu A, Wu B, Guo J, Luo W, Wu D, Yang H, Yang Z. Elevated expression of CDK4 in lung cancer. J Transl Med. 2011;9(1):38.

Padhye A, Konen JM, Rodriguez BL, Fradette JJ, Ochieng JK, Diao L, Gibbons DL. Targeting CDK4 overcomes EMT-mediated tumor heterogeneity and therapeutic resistance in KRAS-mutant lung cancer. JCI Insight. 2021;6(17):e148392.

Bouclier C, Simon M, Laconde G, Pellerano M, Diot S, Lantuejoul S, et al. Stapled peptide targeting the CDK4/Cyclin D interface combined with abemaciclib inhibits KRAS mutant lung cancer growth. Theranostics. 2020;10(5):2008-2022.

da Silva DA, De Luca A, Squitti R, Rongioletti M, Rossi L, Machado CM, Cerchiaro G. Copper in tumors and the use of copper-based compounds in cancer treatment. J Inorg Biochem. 2022;226:111634.

Luo C, Wu X, Zhang S, Tan J, Huo Y, Zhang X, et al. Cuproptosis: a novel therapeutic mechanism in lung cancer. Cancer Cell Int. 2025;25(1):231.

Li K, Wu L, Wang H, Fu Z, Gao J, Liu X, Xie D. Apoptosis and cuproptosis co-activated copper-based metal-organic frameworks for cancer therapy. J Nanobiotechnol. 2024;22(1):546.

Farag B, Zaki ME, Elsayed DA, Gomha SM. Benzimidazole chemistry in oncology: recent developments in synthesis, activity, and SAR analysis. RSC Adv. 2025;15(23):18593-18647.

Ibrahim HA, Refaat HM. Versatile mechanisms of 2-substituted benzimidazoles in targeted cancer therapy. Future J Pharm Sci. 2020;6(1):41.

Almalki AS, Nazreen S, Elbehairi SEI, Asad M, Shati AA, Alfaifi MY, Alam MM. Design, synthesis, anticancer activity and molecular docking studies of new benzimidazole derivatives bearing 1,3,4-oxadiazole moieties as potential thymidylate synthase inhibitors. New J Chem. 2022;46(31):14967-14978.

Youssif BG, Morcoss MM, Bräse S, Abdel-Aziz M, Abdel-Rahman HM, Abdelhafez ESM, et al. Benzimidazole-based derivatives as apoptotic antiproliferative agents: design, synthesis, docking, and mechanistic studies. Molecules. 2024;29(2):446.

Wagih N, Abdel-Rahman IM, El-Koussi NA, Abuo-Rahma GEDA. Anticancer benzimidazole derivatives as inhibitors of epigenetic targets: a review article. RSC Adv. 2025;15(2):966-1010.

Garg A, Khan MA. A systematic review of the impact of benzimidazole-based anthelmintics on lung cancer in animal models. Curr Drug Saf. 2025;20(3):303-310.

Nguyen VT, Huynh TKC, Ho GTT, Nguyen THA, Nguyen TLA, Dao DQ, et al. Metal complexes of benzimidazole-derived ligands as potential anticancer agents: synthesis, characterization, combined experimental and computational studies. R Soc Open Sci. 2022;9(9):220659.

Hussain A, AlAjmi MF, Rehman MT, Khan AA, Shaikh PA, Khan RA. Evaluation of transition metal complexes of benzimidazole-derived scaffold as promising anticancer chemotherapeutics. Molecules. 2018;23(5):1232.

Hopkins AL. Network pharmacology: the next paradigm in drug discovery. Nat Chem Biol. 2008;4(11):682-690.

Meng XY, Zhang HX, Mezei M, Cui M. Molecular docking: a powerful approach for structure-based drug discovery. Curr Comput Aided Drug Des. 2011;7(2):146-157.

Ferreira LG, dos Santos RN, Oliva G, Andricopulo AD. Molecular docking and structure-based drug design strategies. Molecules. 2015;20(7):13384-13421.

Hollingsworth SA, Dror RO. Molecular dynamics simulation for all. Neuron. 2018;99(6):1129-1143.

Hospital A, Goñi JR, Orozco M, Gelpí JL. Molecular dynamics simulations: advances and applications. Adv Appl Bioinform Chem. 2015;8:37-47.

Genheden S, Ryde U. The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2015;10(5):449-461.

Published

2026-10-01