Prospective Validation of a Metabolic-Comorbidity Risk Score for Early Deterioration in Adult Dengue
Keywords:
dengue, prediction, diabetes, hypertension, early deterioration, risk scoreAbstract
Background: Early identification of adults with dengue who are likely to deteriorate could improve monitoring and triage, especially in settings with high prevalence of diabetes and hypertension.
Objective: To prospectively validate a parsimonious risk score combining metabolic comorbidity with routine admission variables.
Methods: Adults with laboratory-confirmed dengue were recruited at three hospitals and followed through discharge. A previously specified five-item score included diabetes, hypertension, age ≥50 years, platelet count <100×10^9/L and haematocrit above the sex-specific reference range. The primary outcome was clinical deterioration within 72 hours, defined as severe dengue, shock, major bleeding, organ dysfunction or unplanned high-dependency transfer.
Results: Among 912 participants, 118 (12.9%) met the primary outcome. Event rates increased from 3.1% in the low-risk category to 11.8% in the intermediate category and 31.6% in the high-risk category. The score achieved an AUC of 0.78 (95% CI 0.74–0.82) with good calibration across deciles of predicted risk. Removing the two comorbidity variables reduced the AUC to 0.72. At a threshold selected to prioritise sensitivity, the model identified 86% of deteriorating patients while classifying 41% of the cohort as requiring enhanced monitoring. Performance was similar across hospitals and between men and women.
Conclusion: A simple score combining diabetes, hypertension and routine laboratory findings showed useful prospective discrimination for early dengue deterioration. External validation in different transmission settings and implementation studies are needed before clinical adoption.
Publication format: research abstract. No full-text manuscript accompanies this record.
References
Sobuj DR, Rashid T, Arif SI, Miah M, Maniruzzaman M, Tasnova M, Rana MRR, Jaman MS. Prevalence of hypertension and diabetes mellitus as comorbidities among hospitalized dengue patients in Dhaka, Bangladesh. J Prev Complement Med. 2026;5(2):92-100. doi:10.22034/jpcm.2026.580371.1319.
Whitehorn J, Farrar J. Dengue. Br Med Bull. 2010;95:161-173.
World Health Organization. Global Strategy for Dengue Prevention and Control 2012-2020. Geneva: WHO; 2012.
Pan American Health Organization. Dengue: Guidelines for Patient Care in the Region of the Americas. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: PAHO; 2016.
Murray NEA, Quam MB, Wilder-Smith A. Epidemiology of dengue: past, present and future prospects. Clin Epidemiol. 2013;5:299-309.
Endy TP, Anderson KB, Nisalak A, Yoon IK, Green S, Rothman AL, et al. Determinants of inapparent and symptomatic dengue infection in a prospective study of primary school children in Kamphaeng Phet, Thailand. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5(3):e975.
Thomas L, Brouste Y, Najioullah F, Hochedez P, Hatchuel Y, Moravie V, et al. Predictors of severe manifestations in a cohort of adult dengue patients. J Clin Virol. 2010;48(2):96-99.
Lee IK, Liu JW, Yang KD. Clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes in adults experiencing dengue hemorrhagic fever complicated with acute renal failure. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;80(4):651-655.
Lee IK, Hsieh CJ, Lee CT, Liu JW. Diabetic patients suffering dengue are at risk for development of dengue shock syndrome/severe dengue. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2020;53(1):166-173.
Toledo J, George L, Martinez E, Lazaro A, Han WW, Coelho GE, et al. Relevance of non-communicable comorbidities for the development of the severe forms of dengue: a systematic literature review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(1):e0004284.
Kuo MC, Lu PL, Chang JM, Lin MY, Tsai JJ, Chen YH, et al. Impact of renal failure on the outcome of dengue viral infection. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3(5):1350-1356.
Tsheten T, Clements ACA, Gray DJ, Adhikary RK, Wangdi K. Clinical predictors of severe dengue: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect Dis Poverty. 2021;10(1):123.
World Health Organization. Hypertension. Geneva: WHO; 2023.
World Health Organization. Diabetes. Geneva: WHO; 2024.
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026. Diabetes Care. 2026;49(Suppl 1).
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The STROBE statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med. 2007;4(10):e296.
Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KGM. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD). Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(1):55-63.
Wolff RF, Moons KGM, Riley RD, Whiting PF, Westwood M, Collins GS, et al. PROBAST: a tool to assess risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies. Ann Intern Med. 2019;170(1):51-58.
Riley RD, Snell KIE, Ensor J, Burke DL, Harrell FE Jr, Moons KGM, Collins GS. Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model: Part II-binary and time-to-event outcomes. Stat Med. 2019;38(7):1276-1296.
Steyerberg EW. Clinical Prediction Models. 2nd ed. Cham: Springer; 2019.
Harrell FE Jr. Regression Modeling Strategies. 2nd ed. Cham: Springer; 2015.
Van Calster B, McLernon DJ, van Smeden M, Wynants L, Steyerberg EW. Calibration: the Achilles heel of predictive analytics. BMC Med. 2019;17:230.
Vickers AJ, Elkin EB. Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Making. 2006;26(6):565-574.
DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves. Biometrics. 1988;44(3):837-845.
Rubin DB. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: Wiley; 1987.
Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Modern Epidemiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
VanderWeele TJ. Principles of confounder selection. Eur J Epidemiol. 2019;34(3):211-219.
World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191-2194.
World Health Organization. Vector-borne diseases. Geneva: WHO; 2024.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Dengue: Clinical Guidance. Atlanta: CDC; 2025.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lucía Navarro, Suman Shrestha, Minh Anh Nguyen

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0). Sharing and adaptation are permitted with appropriate attribution, a link to the licence and an indication of changes. Third-party material may be subject to separate terms stated in its credit line.